Two men at a gym sitting on the floor stretching, wearing Prostate Cancer UK exercise clothes

Exercise as Medicine: evidence review

Evidence review

Introduction 

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK, with around 540,000 men living with or after prostate cancer in the UK (1). This number is likely to increase due to an aging population, and advancements in screening and treatments.

Whilst survival rates are high, treatment and the cancer itself can lead to severe side effects that affect day-to-day life and overall wellbeing.

Physical activity has broad and clinically meaningful potential for health improvement across the prostate cancer pathway, predominately side-effect management, quality of life, and long-term outcomes including recurrence and prognosis (2). It may also support potential tumour suppression, although the evidence on this has focused mainly on pre-clinical trials with small sample size, therefore more research is needed (3).

Although exercise is endorsed in national and international cancer guidelines as explored in section 3.2, cancer patients across a range of tumour types do not meet recommended activity levels (4), and some research suggests that men become even less physically active following a prostate cancer diagnosis (5). Access to quality exercise programmes within the NHS remains limited, and there is currently no national guidance providing prostate cancer–specific FITT (frequency, intensity, time, and type) recommendations.

This review aims to synthesise the current evidence on the impact of exercise on prostate cancer, its treatments and treatment-related side effects.

The evidence on the impact of obesity on overall prostate cancer risk is inconclusive, but some research suggests that being overweight or obese has been associated with a higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer (6).  

In the UK, it's estimated that reducing the body mass index (BMI) of men aged 55-64 to the healthy range (18.5-24.0) could prevent approximately 1,300 prostate cancer deaths annually (7). It should be noted however, that a major limitation of BMI is that it does not distinguish between lean muscle mass and fat mass, nor does it account for sex, age or other aspects of body composition. It may not be accurate for athletes, people with oedema and across racial groups, particularly in Black men, who tend to have higher muscle mass. (8)

In radical prostatectomy, higher BMI is associated with increased risk of recurrence, poorer prognosis, and a higher risk of wound complications (9). In a small presurgical weight loss study, greater reductions in body fat were associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications (28.6% vs 73.3%), although the sample size was small and findings require confirmation in larger trials (10).

Increasing physical activity in combination with caloric restriction are key factors in reducing fat mass. To mitigate the loss of muscle and bone mass brought about by this energy imbalance, resistance training should be incorporated into any weight-loss programme, especially in prostate cancer populations (11).

2.1 Exercise and Treatment Viability

Research suggests that exercise may lead to better cancer-related outcomes and a review by Galvao et al suggests exercise interventions may have therapeutic potential. For example, one prospective study found that patients who had adopted lifestyle changes, such as dietary modifications and physical activity, experienced a reduction in PSA levels (4% decrease in intervention group versus 6% increase in the non-intervention group) and none progressed to active treatment, compared with 6 men in the non-intervention group. (12). This narrative review examined the potential role of exercise in men with low-risk, localised prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. Conclusions are limited by small study sizes and a lack of large randomized controlled trials.

According to the NPCA State of the Nation 2025 report, radiotherapy was used to treat approximately 30% of tumours diagnosed in England and Wales between 2019 and 2024 (National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) State of the Nation Report October 2025. London: National Cancer Audit Collaborating Centre, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025, n.d.). Preliminary research has found exercise may help improve radiotherapy treatment effectiveness by enhancing blood flow and oxygen delivery to tumours, which could increase radiosensitivity (3).

2.2 The impact of exercise on tumour and biochemical markers

Excess fat can create an environment that supports tumour growth, potentially contributing to cancer progression and recurrence. Although evidence in prostate cancer is limited, research in other cancer types suggests that physical activity can slow tumour growth and progression across different stages of disease, while reducing the proliferation of metastatic cells. Exercise also limits systemic inflammation, a known promoter of tumour progression. In prostate cancer, physical activity has been shown to improve biochemical markers, including reducing PSA levels. (3,12).

2.3 The impact of exercise on treatment side-effects

2.3.1 Fatigue

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients as a result of cancer or its treatment (14).

Although the EAU reports that regular exercise appears to be the best protective measure against fatigue (15), the evidence is inconclusive. A meta-analysis by Andersen et al. reported no statistically significant improvements in fatigue in men with prostate cancer following exercise (16).

Sleep

A 2013 review reported sleep disruption in 30–50% of cancer patients, making poor sleep quality several times more prevalent in this population than in the general population (14). Whilst aerobic exercise has been shown to improve sleep quality in the general population, studies in cancer patients are not consistent throughout the literature and should be interpreted with caution (Campbell et al., 2019).

2.3.2 Psychological factors and Quality of Life

The literature on the effect of exercise on psychological factors and QoL in prostate cancer patients is mixed and may be impacted by the side effects of various treatments. The EAU recommend moderate intensity exercise training improves cancer-specific QoL and that supervised exercise interventions delivered over twelve months are effective in reducing psychological distress; particularly in those men with highest levels of baseline anxiety and depression (15). In a small study by Langelier et al., men who met activity level guidelines reported better quality of life, improved body image and higher masculinity scores (18). However, Andersen et al. found that the impact of exercise on QoL was small and didn’t reach statistical significance (SMD=0.10, CI 95% −0.01–0.22) (16).

2.3.3 Body composition and metabolic function

Cancer treatments, particularly ADT, often cause rapid loss of lean muscle accompanied by an increase in body fat (15), a condition known as sarcopenic obesity. This may lead to reduced physical function, increased metabolic and cardiovascular risk, poorer quality of life, and worse overall health outcomes. ADT was also associated with a 25% increased risk for diabetes (15).

Despite testosterone suppression limiting the capacity to build muscle (17), exercise interventions during ADT have demonstrated increases in lean body mass and reductions in body fat mass and body fat percentage (15). Interventions have been shown to be particularly effective when initiated at the onset of treatment, as this helps prevent treatment-related declines in muscle strength and physical function (19).

2.3.4 Cardiovascular

According to the European Association of Urology (EAU), cardiovascular mortality is a common cause of death in prostate cancer patients (15). In men on active surveillance, one study found that nearly half of non-prostate cancer deaths were from cardiovascular disease and could occur up to seven times more often than prostate cancer deaths in some populations (20). Additionally, some forms of ADT have been associated with an accelerated cardiovascular risk, with a 57% higher risk of myocardial infarction (15).

Exercise may improve cardiovascular fitness and suppress PSA progression (15), with benefits maintained up to 12 months (21). Andersen et al. found that all exercise modalities were effective in improving cardiovascular fitness (16). In non-cancer populations, exercise has been shown to reduce cardiovascular deaths, myocardial infarctions and hospital admission (22). Additionally, longer-term exercise interventions can reduce systemic inflammation, a key mechanism linked to cardiometabolic health, disease progression, and survival (3).

2.3.5 Bone health

Bone health is another major concern during ADT as it accelerates bone resorption and reduces bone mineral density, therefore increasing the risk of fracture. Severe fractures in men are associated with a significant risk of death (15). Bone mineral density declines by 5-10% in the first 6-12 months of ADT and continues to decrease throughout treatment. In addition, bone is the most common metastatic site, with bone metastases present in approximately 80% of patients presenting with metastatic prostate cancer. (23).

The UK National Guidelines of Bone Health Management recommends combined exercise intervention including resistance training, aerobic exercises and impact exercises, totalling at least three hours per week, for patients with a high risk of falls who are initiating ADT (23).

Age, prostate cancer and exercise

Prostate cancer is a disease associated with older age (24), and its treatment-related side effects are particularly burdensome in older adults, who are already at increased risk of functional decline. An analysis of a US-based randomised controlled trial found that men aged over 70 with a history of cancer were 53% more likely to develop major mobility disability compared to people the same age without cancer (HR=1.53; 95% CI=1.18 to 1.99; P=.001). However, this risk decreased with structured exercise intervention (25).

2.3.6 Incontinence  

According to the NPCA State of the Nation Report 2025, approximately 7% of men diagnosed with low-risk localised prostate cancer in England and Wales underwent radical treatment. Among men with high risk or locally advanced cancer, 69% in England and 68% in Wales received radical treatment (National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) State of the Nation Report October 2025. London: National Cancer Audit Collaborating Centre, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025, n.d.). These treatments can damage the voluntary urethral sphincter and cause incontinence (26). According to the EAU, men who undergo radical prostatectomy have nearly 4 times the risk of developing urinary incontinence than men who are on watchful waiting (15). 

Both the EAU and the American Urological Association recommend pelvic floor muscle training as first-line therapy (15,26).

2.3.7 Sexual function

The EAU found that up to 93% of men undergoing ADT experience a cessation of sexual activity due to reduced libido or impaired ability to gain and maintain erections. As a result, over 80% of couples stop sexual activity completely, affecting both patients and their partners. (15)

In some clinical trials exercise maintained or improved sexual health following treatment, but not in others (17). Prostate Cancer UK recommends pelvic floor exercises as part of pre- and post- treatment management.

2.3.8 Neurological disorders

ADT may negatively affect cognitive function and overall brain health through the suppression or blocking of testosterone (27). Patients treated by ADT reported a significant decline in spatial reasoning and working memory, as well as an increased risk of cognitive conditions such as Alzheimer’s. Additionally, some forms of ADT have been associated with up to a 51% increased risk of stroke. (15)

While evidence that exercise mitigates this risk in men with prostate cancer is currently limited, there is increasing research interest and a growing body of evidence in this field. Studies in the general population show that regular moderate-intensity physical activity improves cognitive function and reduces the risk of stroke and dementia in adults over 50 (28,29).

2.3.9 Pain

An American study reported that cancer-related pain is experienced by 45–59% of patients and survivors and can significantly disrupt daily life. Regular physical activity has been associated with reductions in pain intensity (14), however, evidence regarding the specific types and doses of exercise that are most effective remains limited (17).

3.1 Exercise and Prostate Cancer in Black Men

Black men have twice the risk of developing prostate cancer and experience poorer outcomes (24). Despite this, a systematic review found that participant demographics, including race, were poorly reported. Among the studies that did report race, Black men accounted for only 9.8% of participants. (30) Interventions based on this evidence risk perpetuating bias and widening existing inequities in healthcare. It is vital that this, along with Black men’s perceived barriers and facilitators, are considered when developing targeted exercise programmes.

3.2 Guidelines

National and international guidelines, such as NICE and the EAU, indicate that exercise is generally safe for people with prostate cancer (15,17,31). NICE recommends offering men who are starting or undergoing ADT supervised resistance and aerobic exercise at least twice per week for 12 weeks (31). The NHS suggests >150 minutes per week of moderate intensity exercise, or >75 minutes per week of vigorous intensity, as well as pelvic floor exercises (32,33). However, some research suggests that this volume of exercise is not sufficient to bring about any significant improvements in body composition or body weight in men with prostate cancer (11). Additionally, there is no universally available exercise programme for cancer patients in the NHS. In Yorkshire, a survey of 500 people living with cancer found that only 5% took part in a specialised cancer exercise programme and 74% said their healthcare team did not discuss exercise with them following their diagnosis (34). Further research with more participants in various stages of the pathway are needed.

4. Conclusion 

Exercise is generally safe and recommended during all stages of the prostate cancer pathway. It has the potential to minimise the adverse effects of cancer and its treatments and improve men’s quality of life.

While exercise has the potential to support men diagnosed with prostate cancer, this literature review has found critical gaps in the evidence base. There is an urgent need for high-quality studies to fully understand the impact of exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Several areas show conflicting findings, and greater consistency in reporting, alongside larger studies are needed to provide clarity.

Although medical clearance in most cases is not necessary, practitioners should be aware of contraindications to exercise and tailor sessions to individual patient needs and limitations. Attention should be paid to minimising barriers to exercise, especially for Black men who are at a higher risk of prostate cancer yet are underrepresented in research and face additional structural barriers in accessing care.

 

We will be periodically updating this evidence review and our resources for healthcare professionals as and when new evidence becomes available. 

1. Facts and figures | Prostate Cancer UK [Internet]. 2026 [cited 2026 Jan 23]. Available from: https://prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information-and-support/risk-and-symptoms/about-prostate-cancer/facts-and-figures 

2. Bourke L, Smith D, Steed L, Hooper R, Carter A, Catto J, et al. Exercise for men with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Urology. Elsevier B.V.; 2016. p. 693–703. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.047 PubMed PMID: 26632144. 

3. Hojman P, Gehl J, Christensen JF, Pedersen BK. Molecular Mechanisms Linking Exercise to Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Cell Metabolism. Cell Press; 2018. p. 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.015 PubMed PMID: 29056514. 

4. Haider ZF, Smith SG, Walwyn REA, Lally P, Fisher A, Beeken RJ. Factors associated with physical activity in individuals with metastatic cancer: a UK cross-sectional survey. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2024. doi:10.1007/s11764-024-01700-5 

5. Fassier P, Zelek L, Partula V, Srour B, Bachmann P, Touillaud M, et al. Variations of physical activity and sedentary behavior between before and after cancer diagnosis: Results from the prospective population-based NutriNet-Santé cohort. Medicine (United States). 2016;95(40). doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004629 PubMed PMID: 27749527. 

6. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Available at dietandcancerreport.org. Report. 

7. WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022 [Internet]. 2022. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders. 

8. Prostate cancer risk | Cancer Research UK [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer/risk-factors 

9. Lee SF, Nikšić M, Luque-Fernandez MA. Understanding the role of metabolic syndrome in prostate cancer risk: A UK Biobank prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2025 Dec 1;15(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-025-85501-5 PubMed PMID: 39824873. 

10. Perez-Cornago A, Dunneram Y, Watts EL, Key TJ, Travis RC. Adiposity and risk of prostate cancer death: a prospective analysis in UK Biobank and meta-analysis of published studies. BMC Med. 2022 Dec 1;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02336-x PubMed PMID: 35509091. 

11. Shah UA, Ballinger TJ, Bhandari R, Dieli-Conwright CM, Guertin KA, Hibler EA, et al. Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer: Opportunities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Jun 1;2023(61):56–67. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad001 PubMed PMID: 37139984. 

12. Keto CJ, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Presti JC, Kane CJ, Amling CL, et al. Obesity is associated with castration-resistant disease and metastasis in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH database. BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(4):492–8. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10754.x PubMed PMID: 22094083. 

13. Luo R, Chen Y, Ran K, Jiang Q. Effect of obesity on the prognosis and recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec 1;9(6):2713–22. doi:10.21037/tau-20-1352 

14. Morgan MF, Frugé AD, Demark-Wahnefried W, Nix JW, Rais-Bahrami S. A Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients with Overweight and Obesity Participating in a Presurgical Weight Loss Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 1;17(9). doi:10.3390/cancers17091496 

15. Halabi S, Ou SS, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ. Inverse correlation between body mass index and clinical outcomes in men with advanced castration-recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer. 2007 Oct 1;110(7):1478–84. doi:10.1002/cncr.22932 PubMed PMID: 17665494. 

16. Galvão DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N, Gardiner RA, Taylor R, Risbridger GP, et al. Enhancing active surveillance of prostate cancer: The potential of exercise medicine. Nature Reviews Urology. Nature Publishing Group; 2016. p. 258–65. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2016.46 PubMed PMID: 26954333. 

17. National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) State of the Nation Report October 2025. London: National Cancer Audit Collaborating Centre, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. 

18. Mustian KM, Sprod LK, Research [, Janelsins M, Peppone LJ, Mohile S. Exercise Recommendations for Cancer-Related Fatigue, Cognitive Impairment, Sleep problems, Depression, Pain, Anxiety, and Physical Dysfunction: A Review. Report. 

19. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Madrid 2025. ISBN 978-94-92671-29-5. 

20. Andersen MF, Midtgaard J, Bjerre ED. Do Patients with Prostate Cancer Benefit from Exercise Interventions? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI; 2022. doi:10.3390/ijerph19020972 PubMed PMID: 35055794. 

21. Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, et al. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov 1;51(11):2375–90. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116 PubMed PMID: 31626055. 

22. Firkins J, Hansen L, Driessnack M, Dieckmann N. Quality of life in “chronic” cancer survivors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. Springer; 2020. p. 504–17. doi:10.1007/s11764-020-00869-9 PubMed PMID: 32162194. 

23. Venderbos LDF, Van Den Bergh RCN, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Essink-Bot ML, Bangma CH, et al. A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels. Psychooncology. 2015 Mar 1;24(3):348–54. doi:10.1002/pon.3657 PubMed PMID: 25138075. 

24. Langelier DM, Cormie P, Bridel W, Grant C, Albinati N, Shank J, et al. Perceptions of masculinity and body image in men with prostate cancer: the role of exercise. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;26(10):3379–88. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4178-1 PubMed PMID: 29654565. 

25. Newton RU, Galvão DA, Spry N, Joseph D, Chambers SK, Gardiner RA, et al. Timing of exercise for muscle strength and physical function in men initiating ADT for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Sep 1;23(3):457–64. doi:10.1038/s41391-019-0200-z PubMed PMID: 32020032. 

26. Luo Z, Chi K, Zhao H, Liu L, Yang W, Luo Z, et al. Cardiovascular mortality by cancer risk stratification in patients with localized prostate cancer: a SEER-based study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1130691 

27. Galvão DA, Spry N, Denham J, Taaffe DR, Cormie P, Joseph D, et al. A multicentre year-long randomised controlled trial of exercise training targeting physical functioning in men with prostate cancer previously treated with androgen suppression and radiation from TROG 03.04 radar. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):856–64. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.041 PubMed PMID: 24113319. 

28. Dibben GO, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson DR, Zwisler AD, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press; 2023. p. 452–69. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac747 PubMed PMID: 36746187. 

29. Edmunds K, Tuffaha H, Scuffham P, Galvão DA, Newton RU. The role of exercise in the management of adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a rapid review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020;28:5661–71. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05637-0/Published 

30. Hayes SC, Newton RU, Spence RR, Galvão DA. The Exercise and Sports Science Australia position statement: Exercise medicine in cancer management. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. p. 1175–99. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.003 PubMed PMID: 31277921. 

31. Inequalities in prostate cancer mortality in England | Prostate Cancer UK [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 23]. Available from: https://prostatecanceruk.org/for-health-professionals/data-and-evidence/inequalities-in-prostate-cancer-mortality-in-england 

32. Brown JC, Yang S. Physical activity and mobility disability in older adult cancer survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Oct 1;9(5). doi:10.1093/jncics/pkaf084 PubMed PMID: 40930715. 

33. Sandhu JS, Breyer BN, Comiter C, Eastham JA, Gomez ; Christopher, Kirages DJ, et al. Guideline Panel Amendment Panel Staff and Consultants. 2024. Report. 

34. Northey JM, Cherbuin N, Pumpa KL, Smee DJ, Rattray B. Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: A systematic review with meta-Analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. BMJ Publishing Group; 2018. p. 154–60. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096587 PubMed PMID: 28438770. 

35. Stroke risk factors and understanding exercise and stroke [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 26]. Available from: https://www.world-stroke.org/world-stroke-day-campaign/prevent-stroke/stroke-and-exercise 

36. Patki S, Aquilina J, Thorne R, Aristidou I, Rodrigues FB, Warren H, et al. A Systematic Review of Patient Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Educational Attainment in Prostate Cancer Treatment Randomised Trials—Is the Evidence Base Applicable to the General Patient Population? Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Aug 1;54:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.015 

37. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management NICE guideline [Internet]. 2019. Report. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131 

38. Keep active: a guide to exercises for men with prostate cancer following surgery Physiotherapy Department. Report. 

39. Physical activity and cancer | King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.kch.nhs.uk/services/cancer/help-and-support/physical-activity-and-cancer/ 

40. Lopez P, Newton RU, Taaffe DR, Singh F, Lyons-Wall P, Buffart LM, et al. Interventions for Improving Body Composition in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 May 1;54(5):728–40. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002843 PubMed PMID: 34935706. 

41. Yorkshire Research. Exercise following a cancer diagnosis: Giving people in Yorkshire more life to live. 2023. Report. 

 ​